Well I’m back in and will start posting again. Sorry for not doing so but my publisher and I were having a hard time getting back in after WordPress got hacked in. I went to WordPress.com and they had no records. I went to WordPress.org but couldn’t find any way of contacting them. I don’t know how he did it but I’m grateful for Mel diligence on this matter. It’s great to be back on line.
Seest thou a man wise in his own conceit? there is more hope for a fool than him. Proverbs 26:12
I had someone who posted on my comment where I said , Agenda 21 you think? He said he found it amusing I would post that on a Conservative site. What he doesn’t understand is I don’t care if it is Conservative, Liberal, or Independent. If I disagree with something I am going to say so. If I feel something needs to be brought out I will do so. This is why I call myself and Independent Conservative. What he doesn’t seem to know is it was a Republican that brought Agenda 21 to the US.
So now with all that said I will continue to bring out things in Agenda 21. This is now the meat of the agenda: Section 1: Social and Economic Dimensions In this section it all sounds good and something you would want, like; “Neither will it gather momentum if the developing countries are weighted down by external indebtedness, if development fiance is inadequate, if barriers restrict access to markets and if commodity prices and terms of trade of developing countries remain depressed.”
It is true that being indebted does not help the people of that country. We see that in our own country. The more debt the country has the more they take from the people and the prices goes higher. Then people get less for their money. It states there needs to be a multilateral trade among the nations which “leads to the optimal distribution of global production in accordance with comparative advantage is of benefit to all trading partners“. Doesn’t this sound a little of distribution of the wealth garbage? Hasn’t the Democratic Party been dogmatic about distribution of the wealth?
The agenda talked about how uneven trade is among the countries. How protectionist endanger this multilateral trade they are trying to develop among the nations. Also, some countries have “adopted courageous policy reforms involving ambitious autonomous trade liberalization.”
Actions: Eliminate Protectionism. This is why our jobs are going over seas and all this free trade increased when this came into practice. Now we had free trade with China because of Reagan which was fine until China started demanding us to give them our patents and manufacturing secrets in order to build a plant in China. So if you look at the trade you will find that during the first Reagan term the trade back and forth was about equal. However, by 1989 this seems to change. This is because China replace tariffs with a Value Added Tax. So they got the advantage over us. By September of this year we exported an average of 8754.49 products while China has shipped an average of 34552.32 products to us. We need to change our role and we need to start back to putting a tax on their products. They are undercutting us and we need to do something about it!
Now we have NAFTA and there is another one in the process with South America, Mexico, US, and Canada. It’s on its way. We lost money because of NAFTA so we will loose more when this comes into play. I got this from a guy who is from Britain and he told of NAFTA before NAFTA was talked about. However, you notice we are pretty much the only ones following this thing on protectionism elimination and we are suffering from it.
Next the agenda talks about poverty and what to do about it; The eradication of poverty and hunger, greater equity in income distribution and human resource development remain major challenges everywhere. The struggle against poverty is the shared responsibility of all countries. You notice it says “in income distribution”! Come on socialism is not the way to get rid of poverty. History has proven this over and over again. The more the US goes towards socialism the more the people loose. You notice that the other countries that went more towards what we use to have in this country are not suffering as bad and getting stronger in their economics, Russia and China for examples. People are so blind.
Now get this part where they say helps with poverty and think about what has been going on here in the US; An effective strategy for tackling the problems of poverty, development and environment simultaneously should begin by focusing on resources, production and people and should cover demographic issues, enhanced health care and education, the rights of women, the role of youth and of indigenous people and local communities and a democratic participation process in association with improved governance. B. (e) Set up an effective primary health care and maternal health care system accessible to all; Enhanced health care, Obamacare. Remember when the Clintons were in office Hillary Clinton wanted to pass a health care similar to Obamacare, denying people overweight medical attention. Yet a lot of reasons for overweight is not because people eat a lot but because the government lets the food industries put chemicals, hormones, and now letting Pepsi look into fetuses to enhance their drinks! Our government is letting these companies kill us and China is laughing at us. They sit there and blame us for our ill-health when it is them!
I found this laughable; To provide all persons urgently with the opportunity to earn a sustainable livelihood; It seems the Democratic party doesn’t understand this part. You notice it says “opportunity to earn” not steal from someone and give to them. They said that these implantation they suggest is to be brought across the people as being urgent. Now you know why the Democrats always have a crises and things must be done now.
Lay out; (a) Empowering women through full participation in decision-making; (b) Respecting the cultural integrity and the rights of indigenous people and their communities; (c) Promoting or establishing grass-roots mechanisms to allow for the sharing of experience and knowledge between communities; (d) Giving communities a large measure of participation in the sustainable management and protection of the local natural resources in order to enhance their productive capacity; (e) Establishing a network of community-based learning centres for capacity-building and sustainable development. .
Does multiculturalism sound familiar? This actual divides a country and not help. Now don’t get me wrong because I have French/Indian in me I do have my traditions that has been handed down to me. The thing is I believe that you are either a US citizen or not. I don’t believe you are half a US citizen and half African, Mexican, or anything else. I covered this in my book and if you want to know exactly what I’m saying read it. But, I will say this, it divides a country when you look at the differences and that’s what this does. We need to come together and look at what we have in common and one of the things we have in common is that we are US citizens.
B. (j)b Governments should take active steps to implement programmes to establish and strengthen preventive and curative health facilities, which include women-centred, women-managed, safe and effective reproductive health care and affordable, accessible services, as appropriate, for the responsible planning of family size, in keeping with freedom, dignity and personally held values, taking into account ethical and cultural considerations. Programmes should focus on providing comprehensive health care, including pre-natal care, education and information on health and responsible parenthood and should provide the opportunity for all women to breast-feed fully, at least during the first four months post-partum. Programmes should fully support women’s productive and reproductive roles and well-being, with special attention to the need for providing equal and improved health care for all children and the need to reduce the risk of maternal and child mortality and sickness; Now you know why they are into the woman’s right with her body junck came from. The thing is we cut out how many children we have yet the illegal immagrants increase the amount of children they have here. How about this one: (c) Strengthen existing structures in the United Nations system for coordination of action relating to poverty eradication, including the establishment of a focal point for information exchange and the formulation and implementation of replicable pilot projects to combat poverty; Strengthen existing structures in the United Nations system?! Yes it looks like them wanting power over countries or can I say “One World Government”? Bush’s “New World Order”?
3.12. National capacity-building for implementation of the above activities is crucial and should be given high priority. Chapter four deals with consumption patterns. 4.2. Since the issue of changing consumption patterns is very broad, it is addressed in several parts of Agenda 21, notably those dealing with energy, transportation and wastes, and in the chapters on economic instruments and the transfer of technology. The present chapter should also be read in conjunction with chapter 5 (Demographic dynamics and sustainability). You notice that it deals with energy, gas, coal, wind power, and so on. This is why we are going through this “green” program. This is the direct results of chapter 4 of Agenda 21. They make it sound at least to me that poverty is the result of consumption. Poverty and environmental degradation are closely interrelated. While poverty results in certain kinds of environmental stress, the major cause of the continued deterioration of the global environment is the unsustainable pattern of consumption and production, particularly in industrialized countries, which is a matter of grave concern, aggravating poverty and imbalances.
Again it not only talked about food, shelter, and education, but again health care. A. (b) Developed countries should take the lead in achieving sustainable consumption patterns; Developing countries should seek to achieve sustainable consumption patterns in their development process, guaranteeing the provision of basic needs for the poor, while avoiding those unsustainable patterns, particularly in industrialized countries, generally recognized as unduly hazardous to the environment, inefficient and wasteful, in their development processes. This requires enhanced technological and other assistance from industrialized countries.
Once more this is a way of taking from you if you having enough to eat to where you have little to eat as well as the poor. Now I don’t mind helping the poor but there is the old saying “Give a man a fish he eats for a day, But, teach him to fish he eats for a life time.” We need to create jobs and you don’t do it by taxing. In this chapter they talk about creating a data base to keep track of consumption. This is to get a relationship between production, consumption, environment, technological adaptation and innovation, economic growth and development, and demographic factors. To see how changes affect these areas and how economics can grow with reductions on energy and materials. The government and industries need to come together to implement this plan. In chapter 5 they talk about the population growth being too high. Now we get into abortion right? They said that the rapid growth of the cities “ face major environmental problems.” and that “Population policy should also recognize the role played by human beings in environmental and development concerns.” More data is to be gathered about trends, nter alia(among other things), sex and age in order to take into account the implications of the gender division of labor for the use and management of natural resources. (c) under this chapter talks about areas of human resource development and capacity-building Chapter 6 deals mainly about health issues. They talk about the health needs of the whole world. 6.2. The following programme areas are contained in this chapter:
(a) Meeting primary health care needs, particularly in rural areas; (b) Control of communicable diseases; (c) Protecting vulnerable groups; (d) Meeting the urban health challenge; (e) Reducing health risks from environmental pollution and hazards.
Now look at this; It is also dependent on a healthy environment, including the provision of a safe water supply and sanitation and the promotion of a safe food supply and proper nutrition. We have developed sanitized lotion that is used at stores, schools, work, and at home. Of course we have been treating water long before Agenda 21 here in the US. I wonder though what they consider safe food because our food is not safe because of all those chemicals our companies put in our food. These cause cancer and other health problems but our government does nothing about it. Yes I will probably run this in the ground with you getting mad but our government is poising us. In the summer I grow what I can in my garden because of this. I try to buy dry goods but then you really don’t know what they have been sprayed with. Washing them only gets rid of a little of the chemicals sprayed on them because it gets into the pores of the food. You know what aggravates me is that they charge you more for these organic stuff when they are not spending as much money to grow them. In my opinion they should cost less! They are not putting out as much money for all those chemicals that the other companies spend. Here they want you to promote health education. This is good and people should know the food groups. They want you to set up things where you get the community to get involved “in environmental health activities, including optimization of the appropriate use of community financial and human resources”. (b) pretty explains its self. Again it is to go through Women’s groups to get it implemented. (c) The vulnerable groups are infants, youth, women, indigenous people, and the poor. This goes with education and resources for them to go to. This also includes research. (d) This deals with Urban people being healthy so they can contribute to economic and social development. They claim that there needs to be built more committees at both the political and technical level, including active collaboration on linkages with scientific, cultural, religious, medical, business, social and other city institutions, using networking arrangements. (e) Talks about Urban, Indoor, and Water pollution. There should be research to find out ways to prevent and control pollution. To educate people on pollution. Also, control distribution on pesticides, effects in agriculture and preservation of wood. We know the affects but the government isn’t doing anything. There should be planning for industries and energy facilities to cut out pollution to better the health of the people. Get programs for “ hygiene programs in all major industries for the surveillance of workers’ exposure to health hazards”.
Chapter 7: In industrialized countries, the consumption patterns of cities are severely stressing the global ecosystem, while settlements in the developing world need more raw material, energy, and economic development simply to overcome basic economic and social problems.
It stated that external assistance will help other countries by the year 2000 to improve living conditions and working environment. To help with unemployment. So now you know where they get the spend, spend, and spend syndrome.
4. The overall human settlement objective is to improve the social, economic and environmental quality of human settlements and the living and working environments of all people, in particular the urban and rural poor. This is to be done through all areas, public, private and community sectors. It is to provide shelter for all, promote, get this, construction industries, land use-management, integrate provision for environmental infrastructure: water, sanitation, drainage and solid-waste management, promote sustainable energy and transportation, and much more. Sounds like all this green stuff they came out with doesn’t it?
Declare that it’s a person’s right to have adequate shelter. What do they consider adequate? The objective: The objective is to achieve adequate shelter for rapidly growing populations and for the currently deprived urban and rural poor through an enabling approach to shelter development and improvement that is environmentally sound.
Now there was someone on my facebook that told me about the cells they are constructing in California. Japan has small cell places for people to live in. They are right now hotel rooms. But don’t be surprised if they become what they want you to live in. This was one person’s review of his experence: “I stayed two nights. I did not sleep well the first night due to the loud sound of the air conditioning equipment. I requested and received the next night, another capsule that was more quiet and next to an outside window. The interior capsules have not contact with the outside world. I was not able to turn on the television or radio. Having access to the hot tubs was great. Having to check out each day and having to stow your luggage was an inconvenience.”
They wanted most populations by the turn of the century in cities and not outside the cities. By the turn of the century, the majority of the world’s population will be living in cities. Now you know why the government has been doing a lot of land grabs.
C. Adopting innovative city planning strategies to address environmental and social issues by:
i. Reducing subsidies on, and recovering the full costs of, environmental and other services of high standard (e.g. water supply, sanitation, waste collection, roads, telecommunications) provided to higher income neighbourhoods;
They are to get businesses to actively participate in this. The cities are to come up with rules and regulations to support this. They are to empower community groups, non-governmental organizations and individuals to assume the authority get environment issues brought up and manage through techniques.
In chapter 8 it talks about improving or restructuring the decision-making process. To get people to get involved that are concern about the environment and development process. To establish economic, social and environmental policies. To form public views.
5. b. Adopting comprehensive analytical procedures for prior and simultaneous assessment of the impacts of decisions, including the impacts within and among the economic, social and environmental spheres; these procedures should extend beyond the project level to policies and programmes; analysis should also include assessment of costs, benefits and risks;
The countries are to develop a system to collect all data to monitor and evaluate the progress.
Now get this;
13. Laws and regulations suited to country-specific conditions are among the most
important instruments for transforming environment and development policies into action, not only through “command and control” methods, but also as a normative framework for economic planning and market instruments.
To enhance this plan educational institutions are to change their curriculum to teaching and strengthening sustainable development economics and you thought you hadn’t been brainwashed. They encourage businesses to have training programs of this sort for private sector and other groups, also. All brainwashing and people don’t even realize it.
Oh by the way that “No child Left Behind” (May 23, 2001) is from the UN document, The Right to Education, April 20, 2001. This was adopted without a vote; The Economic and Social Council, taking note of Commission on Human Rights resolution 2001/29 of 20 April 2001, endorses the Commission’s decision to renew, for a period of three years the mandate of the Special Rapporteur on the right to education, and the request of the Commission to the Secretary-General to provide the Special Rapporteur with all the assistance necessary for the execution of her mandate. [E/CN.4/2001/167 - E/2001/23 chap. I, draft decision 19.] Coincidence?
The thing is when you put so many laws and regulations it cuts the economic growth and our freedoms! This is why our freedoms are getting to be less and less. This agenda our government has put above our Constitution. In fact this agenda as I see it has replaced our Constitution!
Well I thought I would do Section I and II but this has gotten longer than it is suppose to be. Section II will have chapters 9-22.
I went to Amazon.com/books to see if anyone left a commit on it. Surprise, surprise someone did. He rant and raved. Well it wasn’t really a surprise. This is what he said.
This author should have used an editor before going to print, the book in any form is difficult to read with the glaring errors in grammar and simple context. The book is full of inaccuracies, both current and historical which makes it even more difficult for anyone interested the subject matter to read with any degree of seriousness. When Nazi’s, Communists and Liberals are all thrown into the same box, shaken (not stirred) and found to have the same political mind and values it is obvious the author is not writing a well researched book but instead writing a ideological rant.
This author is clearly not an Independent Conservative as the title indicates, with some of her sources being extreme Right opinion ‘news’ blogs, media outlets and others. Her inability to draw clear timelines in US history creates a jumble and her misreading of both the US Constitution and the Declaration of Independence shows her lack of understanding of both the Age of Enlightenment and the men who wrote these foundational documents.
I will always return to the idea, opinions are free and everyone has them. You do not however have the right to your own facts. I would highly recommend avoiding this book unless like me you are given it free, even then unless you have a high tolerance skip it.
1st- I had two people edit the book before it went into print because English was never my strong point. Math and Civics are my strong point. I quoted people back then from their own words. There was no unified spelling and that is why Webster came up with the dictionary.
Example: Ships came in for furs and other trade goods. The colonists traded fro everything they needed. It was written,”By this time harvest was come, and in stead of famine, now God gave them plente, and ye face of things was changed, to ye rejoysing of ye harts of many, for which they blessed God.” History of Plymouth Plantation, William Bradford.
I am not going to change spelling because it is a direct quote and that goes for any other quotes.
2nd-I used the 1828 dictionary to get the meaning of words during that time so people would understand things including our Constitution.
3rd-Yes I did go back to other times to show a point. He missed it but then he probably wasn’t liking what I had to say.
4th-My facts came from documents and not off my head or someone else’s. The two that edited my book one was a Historian and I think the first one was too. The second editor not only looked at the grammar but facts, also. I had discussions on some items with both and I tried to reword those areas because I realized that it could be misconstrued. I was told it was a well researched book. The second editor said it will be an eye opener book. This is only true if you want to know the truth. This person evidently doesn’t.
5th-I tried to show how the liberal agenda is heading towards Communism and Nazism. They already have some of these people’s ideas and that it is a dangerous road to take the United States.
6th- yes some of the references are from blogs but how many of you are going to go down to the library or the encyclopedia? I do not know what is a Conservative or Liberal site and I don’t care. What I care a bout is the truth. However, I did put the encyclopedia and books some books. He probably just went to those sites but didn’t think to go to the books and encyclopedia.
One book I put as a reference is We Hold These Truths which is a copy of the Federalist and Anti-Federalist Papers. I gave a web site that gave a short biographical sketch. Another is called, The History of The Decline And Fall of The Roman Empire. This is actually a six volume set. The Political Thought of Plato and Aristotle was another book I used. And others through out the book. So you see he wasn’t totally honest in his review. I even used the Library of Congress as a reference. Yes that was a web site but you can get a hold of information on line. I had a liberal woman make fun of me when I told her she could get the information at the Library of Congress.
7th-He said I am not an Independent Conservative. Why because I don’t agree mostly with liberals? It is true in part one I didn’t have time to put a lot of things I agree upon liberals about like the Pell Grant. I believe this is a good program and would hate to see it scrapped. However, I did put in my book some of the things I did like about Clinton as well as what I didn’t like about him. My biggest thing is these programs should be a state function and not Federal Government function. This goes for healthcare. Most states do have a government healthcare program and they are not as intrusive as Obamacare.
Example from my book:
I do not want to leave with all negative things. What about Americorps that he worked on, which helps students with their college?
Clinton’s administration did get things in to clean up the water and smog. His administration did strengthen the Safe Drinking Water Act, requiring water utilities to provide reports to their customers; however, some places did not conform to that and ended up with salmonella in their water.
The thing is this person read the book with bias eyes and took things out of context which I asked people not to do. I also, said that I don’t claim I know everything. I used the word seem a lot which this person totally ignored.
I even let people know about the Muslim Congressman in the 1800s that took the oath on the Q’ran
I have part 2 coming out some time next year where I will be able to expound on other things. So you decide. I wrote what I thought was important in the book at this point because of the up-coming the election.
I did not write this book out of hatred. I have voted for Republicans, Democrats, and Independents. In fact this year I am voting for Sal Pace because I am mad at Tipton for voting for CISPA. Pace helped stopped the Army from confiscating people’s farms and other land, which by the way has to go through Congress. Pace and McKinley wrote a bill the Pinon Canyon Protection Act to protect them.
The book is just to inform the people of the true history and what to watch out for. It is clearly that this person couldn’t handle the truth. As I had to see it he had to nit pick to keep people from reading it and learning the truth. So if you want to know the truth read all my book and don’t take things out of context. One thing I put in my book is to do research. That means true research, not superficial.
I have been asked why I term myself as an independent conservative and what the difference is. Well there are probably a lot of independent conservatives who do not even know it.
It seems that most “Conservatives” would have someone who has voted on the liberal side or seem to have liberal views just to get rid of the President. Why? I will not do this! This will not help the country!
These candidates talk a good talk like Obama but do not walk the talk. I am very tired of this. If you have liberal views then run as one – do not lie to the American people!
Politicians also seem to go for party instead of the things that are important. I do not toe the party line even though I am registered a Republican. I go by my love for my country and the true history of not only our country but other countries. That is right, I said other countries because thier histories teach us the downfalls of those countries and what to avoid. I have voted for Republicans, Democrats, and Independent candidates.
You see I try to look at the whole picture instead of just part of the picture. Mostly it is because of my mother. She would do this, and as the years went by I learned why she did this. I try to learn as much as I can as well as try to remember what has been going on the years before election year on what the candidates have been doing. That way if the candidates switch their stances the chances are they are wolves in sheeps’ clothing. This is not always true but last minute change?
You may say then why don’t you just call yourself an Independent? The reason I do not do that is because they seem to vote more on a person’s religion. People who call themselves Independents seem to vote more on beliefs and seem to be not as informed as they would like to think they are. Also, usually they are not affiliated with any particular party, and I am.
The reason I term myself as an Independent Conservative is because I consider the past, present, and what might happen in the future when I vote. I do not vote based on whether candidates are liberal or conservative, male or female, what they say during a campaign or because of their race. The thing I consider is whether the candidates have the best interest of this country in mind or just enjoy the power and feel they can do whatever they please ignoring and destroying our Constitution like our president today is doing. One election I voted for my dog as a write in just to show I did not like any of the candidates. I got the idea when Mexico voted for a donkey.
Some years back I took a test that was suppose to show whether you were actually a Libertarian. Even though I was on the Libertarian side it was very close to the line of being a Conservative. This is probably because I go by what I know. There are a lot of things I do not agree with Libertarians. However, Libertarians do believe in self-government.
I strongly believe in self-government but not one candidate talks about that anymore and that it needs to be taught. The thing is you have to teach self-government but it seems that a lot of the younger generation do not know how to control themselves. Then again, we have a lot of people in power who do not know how to control themselves. When you can control yourself you do not need all these laws. You have liberty. You end up with having to have all these laws to control the people because they do not know how to control themselves.
Also, self-government is the people of the United States ruling and not some egotistical president, Congress people, or judges! They are supposed to work for us, not themselves! So you see I believe in both forms of self-government. Our forefathers believed in both forms of self-government. That is why our forefathers set up the government the way they did and why they taught the Bible in schools. This is what helped make our country strong.
The oath of office means nothing to our elected officials, and no one does anything about those in office violating their oaths. It is time to get real Conservatives and not these pretenders. Thomas Jefferson said, “To preserve our independence, we must not let our rulers load us with perpetual debt…I am for a government rigorously frugal and simple.”
He also said, “In questions of power, then, let no more be heard of confidence in man, but bind him down from mischief by the chains of the Constitution.”
Richard Henry Lee wrote,
A militia when properly formed are in fact the people themselves … and include all men capable of bearing arms … To preserve liberty it is essential that the whole body of people always possess arms.
Each state is to keep a well-formed military. Today, this is the National Guard. This group is to be under control of each state, not the federal government. States have the right to protect their borders from illegal immigrants coming in. This is a form of invasion. Illegal immigrants have taken a hill here in the United States. They killed and are bringing in illegal drugs.
Article III of the Articles of Confederation states,
The said States hereby severally enter into a firm league of friendship with each other, for their common defense, the security of their liberties, and their mutual and general welfare, binding themselves to assist each other, against all force offered to, or attacks made upon them, or any of them, on account of religion, sovereignty, trade, or any other pretence whatever.
President Barack Obama does not understand our Constitution and therefore should not even be President. How can one enforce the law if he doesn’t even understand it or knows it? Executive orders are unconstitutional. The U.S. government becomes a dictatorship if a president can undo what Congress does.
Some Democrats have been successful in deceiving the people into thinking guns are a horrible thing. This is another scare tactic. They talk about Republicans using scare tactics. Let’s see, they have global warming, they put every species they can think of on the endangered list (even if they are not endangered), and they claim the Republicans did this or that when it has been them that did it. It seems they think that if something does not work, they tell themselves we will just blame the Republicans because no one checks things out anyway.
Karl Marx said that you can get people to do what you want them to do during a crisis, and everywhere you look there is another crisis, according to Democrats. It makes you wonder what the real reason is they want to get rid of guns.
Our forefathers knew that people fall under a dictatorship the minute they give up their weapons. They allow people to defend themselves from others or from an ambitious government that wants to control their lives and make them slaves. Democrats are the ones who wanted to keep slavery.
On April 11, 1942, Adolf Hitler said,
The most foolish mistake we could possibly make would be to permit the conquered Eastern people have arms. History teaches that all conquerors who have allowed their subject races to carry arms have prepared their own downfall by doing so. Indeed I would go so far as that the underdog is a sine qua non for the overthrow of sovereignty. So let’s not have any native militia or police. German troops alone will bear the sole responsibility for the maintenance of law and order.
Hitler knew history teaches you things! This is why it is so important to learn history! In my day, kids would ask, “Why do I need to learn this stuff?” This is why! Now we have Hillary Clinton trying to make a small arms treaty with the UN which will allow our enemies to come into our homes right here as well as taking your children away from you. Look up the UNCRC. These treaties override our Constitution, but then Obama said that the UN has precedence over our Constitution. You do not think so? Well check it out.
In my book one thing I repeat is to check it out.